GSPP

 

 

Web

Editors

Annette Doornbos

Theresa Wong

eDIGEST  July 2006

 

 

 

Upcoming Events | Quick Reference List  Alumni and Student Newsmakers  Faculty in the News  |  Recent Faculty Speaking EngagementsVideos & Webcasts

 

UPCOMING EVENTS

 

GSPP’s 8th Annual Alumni Recognition Dinner

October 6, 2006 at The Berkeley City Club, 2315 Durant Avenue, Berkeley, California

5:30 pm - cocktail reception, 7:00 pm - dinner

 

QUICK REFERENCE LIST

Back to top

In addition to the print media referenced below, broadcast media coverage includes numerous interviews with DEAN NACHT by KRON TV, KGO TV and KTVU, among others.

ALUMNI AND STUDENT NEWSMAKERS

1. “Mickey Levy of Bank of America, author Ben Stein, former Federal Reserve governor Wayne Angell, John Ryding of Bear Stearns and Joe Lavorgna of Deutsch Bank discuss the Federal Reserve and inflation” (Kudlow & Company, CNBC News, June 29, 2006); features commentary by MICKEY LEVY (MPP 1974).

 

2. “McClatchy confronts Web challenge” (Sacramento Bee, June 28, 2006); story citing GARY PRUITT (MPP 1981); http://www.sacbee.com/content/business/story/14272467p-15082794c.html

 

3. “State’s budget called a victory for all sides. Debt reduced, education fully funded -- governor is expected to sign it Friday” (San Francisco Chronicle, June 28, 2006); story citing MIKE GENEST (MPP 1980); http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/06/28/BAGOEJLJV71.DTL&hw=mike+genest&sn=003&sc=425

 

4. “Bank of America Chief Economist Mickey Levy Provides Economic Outlook During Congressional Testimony” (PR Newswire US, June 27, 2006); story featuring MICKEY LEVY (MPP 1974).

 

5. “WHO investigation shows H5N1 bird flu virus mutated slightly in Indonesian family cluster” (Associated Press Worldstream, June 24, 2006); story citing TIM UYEKI (MPP 1985).

 

6. “Limits on eminent domain are approved by Assembly” (Star-Ledger, The (Newark, NJ), June 23, 2006); story citing ROBERT GORDON (MPP 1975); http://www.nj.com/search/index.ssf?/base/news-3/1151037018214350.xml?starledger?nnj&coll=1

 

7. “Voters have power to fix traffic jams. Infrastructure bond could help Bay Area clear top trouble spots” (Inside Bay Area, June 21, 2006); story citing STUART COHEN (MPP 1997); http://www.insidebayarea.com/search/ci_3962038

 

8. “Why WiFi? Using Mobile Technology to Create a Sense of Place on Your Main Street” (Main Street News, issue no. 229, June 2006); article by CURT GIBBS (MPP 1977); forthcoming online at http://www.mainstreet.org/content.aspx?page=4628&section=8

 

9. “Toyota to Explore Plug-In Hybrids. The Japanese carmaker will make a big push to boost its offering of fuel-efficient vehicles, a top executive says” (Los Angeles Times, June 14, 2006); story citing ROLAND HWANG (MPP 1992); http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-toyota14jun14,1,5609897,print.story

 

10. “AIDS/LifeCycle Rolls Victoriously into Los Angeles, Raising AIDS Awareness, $8 Million for HIV/AIDS Services” (U.S. Newswire, June 10, 2006); story citing MARK CLOUTIER (MPP 1993); http://www.aidslifecycle.org/press/index.html

 

11. “Open Forum: Leadership needed for better health-care research” (San Francisco Chronicle, June 9, 2006); op-ed by CHRISTOPHER WOLF (MPP cand. 2007); http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2006/06/09/EDGDOILMAF1.DTL

 

12. “The fast and the serious - This summer, the multiplex is a good place to study our conflicted relationship with cars” (Times Union, (Albany, NY), June 9, 2006); story citing ROLAND HWANG (MPP 1992).

 

13. “Cool 2 Know: It came unplugged. Examining the modest rise and swift demise of GM’s electric car” (Newsday (Long Island, NY), June 21, 2006); story citing ROLAND HWANG (MPP 1992).

 

14. “State to Delay Benefit Rule; U.S. law set to take effect July 1 requires proof of citizenship for Medi-Cal coverage. Officials fear hasty action could bar legitimate enrollees” (Los Angeles Times, June 7, 2006); story citing report authored by DAVID CARROLL (MPP 2000); http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-medicaid7jun07,1,5308499.story

 

15. “BART loses the way to San Jose. Money to build extension may exist even without failed measure” (Oakland Tribune, June 8, 2006); story citing STUART COHEN (MPP 1997); http://www.insidebayarea.com/search/ci_3912661

 

16. “Lockout at Hospital to End; Contract Talks to Resume” (Knight-Ridder Tribune Business News - The Record (Hackensack, NJ), June 5, 2006); story citing ROBERT GORDON (MPP 1975).

 

17. “Officials call rules lax on site cleanups; Want state, not polluter control” (The Record (Bergen County, NJ), June 2, 2006); story citing ROBERT GORDON (MPP 1975); http://www.bergen.com/page.php?qstr=eXJpcnk3ZjcxN2Y3dnFlZUVFeXkyJmZnYmVsN2Y3dnFlZUVFeXk2OTQyNzAw

 

18. “It isn’t all bad news. Digital ventures recruit readers, offset dreary circulation reports” (Times-Tribune, (Scranton, PA), June 11, 2006); story citing GARY PRUITT (MPP 1981).

 

19. “Study: Too little enterprise in business tax-break zones: Payouts, Not Benefits, Up Dramatically” (San Jose Mercury News, April 18, 2006); story citing study by DAVID CARROLL (MPP 2000).

 

20. “Testimony delivered April 6 before House Subcommittee on Labor-HHS-Education appropriations, to discuss NCI budget request for Fiscal year 2007” (States News Service, April 6, 2006); story citing RICHARD TURMAN (MPP 1987).

 

21. “Housing Needs of Many Low-Income Hurricane Victims Remain Unmet; Study Outlines Additional Federal Steps Needed” (U.S. Newswire, February 23, 2006); story citing study by WILL FISCHER (MPP 1999).

 

22. “Analyst questions impact of Katrina grants on low-income in Miss.” (Associated Press State & Local Wire, January 25, 2006); story citing WILL FISCHER (MPP 1999).

 

FACULTY IN THE NEWS

1. “Berkeley: Bush impeach resolution on ballot. Overwhelming support as council OKs measure” (San Francisco Chronicle, June 29, 2006); story citing HENRY BRADY; http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/06/29/BAGDHJM8JV1.DTL&type=printable

 

2. “Raising a $60 billion question” (San Francisco Chronicle [*requires registration], June 28, 2006); story citing ROBERT MacCOUN; http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/06/28/BUGVJJLAU41.DTL&type=printable

 

3. “Housing bubble deflating” Commentary by ROBERT REICH (Marketplace, National Public Radio, June 28, 2006); Listen to this commentary at: http://marketplace.publicradio.org/shows/2006/06/28/PM200606287.html

 

4. “Robert Reich and Steve Moore debate whether conservatives are happier than liberals” (Kudlow & Company, CNBC News, June 27, 2006); features commentary by ROBERT REICH.

 

5. “Companies Resist Bid to Limit Emissions. State lawmakers will consider a bill to address global warming with industry mandates” (Los Angeles Times, June 26, 2006); story citing study led by MICHAEL HANEMANN; http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-greenhouse26jun26,0,5235168,print.story

 

6. Anderson Cooper 360 Degrees: Fires and Global Warming” (CNN News, Aired June 26, 2006 - 23:00 ET); features interview with MICHAEL HANEMANN; http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0606/26/acd.02.html

 

7. “California sets ethanol goals, but pumps are scarce” (Contra Costa Times [*requires registration], June 25, 2006; story citing DAN KAMMEN; http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/email/news/14899371.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp

 

8. “Poplar trees and grass may make fine gas for cars” (Contra Costa Times [*requires registration)], June 24, 2006); story citing DAN KAMMEN and study co-authored with MICHAEL O’HARE and BRIAN TURNER (MPP 2005); http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/news/breaking_news/14896223.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp

 

9. “On the Grid. Solar power finally took off once it plugged into the larger electrical system” (East Bay Express, June 21, 2006); story citing DAN KAMMEN; http://eastbayexpress.com/Issues/2006-06-21/summer/summerarts3.html

 

10. “50 People Who Matter” (Business 2.0, CNN Money.com, July 2006 issue, posted June 21, 2006); STEPHEN MAURER is named to top 50 list; http://money.cnn.com/magazines/business2/peoplewhomatter/index.html

 

11. “LHS grad lauded for initiative. Berkeley professor named one of ‘50 Who Matter Now’” (Lawrence Journal-World [KS], June 27, 2006); story citing STEPHEN MAURER.

 

12. “California Sets ‘Clean Energy’ Oil Tax on Ballot” (New York Times Online [*requires registration], June 21, 2006; story citing DAN KAMMEN; http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/washington/politics-energy-california-ballot.html?pagewanted=print

 

13. “Forget inflation, that’s deflation looming. Commentator ROBERT REICH warns Fed Chief Ben Bernanke not to become too focused on inflation and miss possible warning signs of deflation” (Marketplace, National Public Radio, June 21, 2006); listen to the commentary at: http://marketplace.publicradio.org/shows/2006/06/21/AM200606211.html

 

14. “With State Coffers Full, Firms Seek Tax Breaks. Businesses seeking concessions on gas fees and the cost of making movies find a willing ally in Democratic Assembly Speaker Fabian Nuñez. But the campaign faces opposition from Republicans...” (Los Angeles Times, June 14, 2006); story citing JOHN ELLWOOD; http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-taxbreaks14jun14,1,2084852,print.story?coll=la-headlines-california

 

15. “Tomorrow’s Forecast: Eight ways to beat the heat” (Los Angeles Times, June 11, 2006); op-ed by DAN KAMMEN; http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-op-chart11jun11,1,1948091,full.story

 

16. “The Numbers Guy: Digging Into the Ethanol Debate” (Wall Street Journal [*requires subscription], June 9, 2006); column citing DAN KAMMEN and study co-authored with MICHAEL O’HARE and BRIAN TURNER (MPP 2005); http://online.wsj.com/article/SB114970102238673892.html

 

17. “Robert Reich and Steve Moore discuss Tom DeLay and the power structure in Washington” (Kudlow & Company, CNBC News, June 9, 2006); features commentary by ROBERT REICH.

 

18. “25 x 25 Energy Plan” (Science Friday, National Public Radio, June 9, 2006); program featuring DAN KAMMEN; podcast at: http://www.sciencefriday.com/pages/2006/Jun/hour2_060906.html

 

19. “Estate tax repeal? Bad for the economy” Commentary by ROBERT REICH (Marketplace Morning Report, National Public Radio, June 7, 2006); listen to the commentary at: http://marketplace.publicradio.org/shows/2006/06/07/AM200606071.html

 

20. “Republicans face veteran Democrats in statewide races this fall” (San Francisco Chronicle, June 7, 2006); story citing HENRY BRADY; http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/n/a/2006/06/07/politics/p151109D05.DTL&type=printable

 

21. “It is now safe to answer the phone again” (Oakland Tribune, June 6, 2006); story citing HENRY BRADY; http://www.insidebayarea.com/portlet/article/html/fragments/print_article.jsp?article=3904359

 

22. “Roundtable: Robert Reich, George Will, Jay Carney” (This Week with George Stephanopoulos, ABC News, June 4, 2006); features commentary by ROBERT REICH.

 

23. “Two Viewpoints on Prop 82: Universal Preschool” (The California Report Magazine, KQED-88.5 FM, June 2, 2006); features commentary by DAVID KIRP; listen to the commentary at: http://www.californiareport.org/domains/californiareport/

 

24. “Op-Ed: On Proposition 82’s call for universal preschool. Should the state educate 4-year-olds? PRO: Preschool is a smart investment” (San Francisco Chronicle, June 1, 2006); op-ed by DAVID KIRP; http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/06/01/EDGDOIJM8F1.DTL&type=printable

 

25. “High likelihood of US military action against Iran says expert” (The World Today, Australian Broadcasting Corporation, April 12, 2006); TV program features interview with MICHAEL NACHT.

 

ALUMNI AND STUDENT NEWSMAKERS

Back to top

1. “Mickey Levy of Bank of America, author Ben Stein, former Federal Reserve governor Wayne Angell, John Ryding of Bear Stearns and Joe Lavorgna of Deutsch Bank discuss the Federal Reserve and inflation” (Kudlow & Company, CNBC News, June 29, 2006); features commentary by MICKEY LEVY (MPP 1974).

 

LARRY KUDLOW, host:

 

On this evening’s program, so the Fed shows the consensus route by raising its target rate a 1/4 point to 5.25 percent. Personally, I thought this was kind of a wuss-out. He flunked the monetary manhood test. Stocks loved it, but so did inflation-sensitive gold and commodities. And as usual, the Fed’s written statement was completely ambiguous, leaving the door open to almost any future outcome, tightening, easing, pausing, invading the Middle East, who knows what! Do they know?

 

Joining me now, a blow-out all-star panel. We’ve got economist Ben Stein, author of “How Successful People Win.” We’ve got former Federal Reserve governor Wayne Angell. We’ve got Mickey Levy, chief economist of Bank of America. John Ryding, chief US economist at Bear Stearns. And Joe LaVorgna, chief bond man at Deutsche Bank….

 

KUDLOW: Mickey Levy, what is your response to Wayne Angell’s point that there’s no clarity of strategy, there’s no clarity of targeting. I think these are spot-on criticisms, and, Mickey, I often fret, the whole idea of data-driven means as Wayne Angell inferred, that the Federal Reserve Board will be looking through the rear-window mirror rather than the front-view windshield. Now, what is your response to that? Doesn’t that set up big risks?

 

Mr. MICKEY LEVY (Bank of America Chief Economist): Larry, you’re exactly right. Monetary policy affects the economy and inflation with a lag. And I think Wayne is also right. We’d all be better off and the Fed would be better off if they had an inflation target that everybody understood and they told everybody how they were going to achieve it. I think today’s statement was rather risky for the Fed in the following regard. It basically said, ‘Well, yeah, we have an upward drift in inflation, but the economy’s moderating.’ They gave us the impression that this moderation in growth is going to slow inflation. Yet inflation’s above where they want it to be. And so the risk is, ‘Well, what if in the next couple of months we get some more bad inflation numbers?’ Then the market’s going to say, ‘Well, the Fed loses credibility and the market and the Fed are going to be upset.’ So, we’re in this transition where the Fed’s--I don’t think they’re done hiking rates. Eventually, when they get to rates high enough so that we know inflation is going to stay low, then that’s exactly where we want to be. But I agree with Wayne, we need an inflation target, and we need a central bank to tell us exactly how they’re going to achieve it….

 

KUDLOW: Right. It’s not changes in the unemployment rate, it’s not changes in the GDP necessarily. It’s the change in the value of money which has something to do with the money volume created by the Fed, does it not?

 

Mr. ANGELL: Well, that’s correct. But not only do you have the price of gold being affected, but we also had the price of houses…. So it’s not the decline in the price of gold that’s going to be the signal, it is the movement of house price to pure deflation….

 

Mr. LEVY: … Look, what you’ve had here is the Fed for four years was too accommodative, money was growing too rapidly, interest rates were way too low, and so for the last couple of years, we’ve had excess demand. Nominal spending growth in the economy’s averaged 6.7 percent, which is way, way, way above the nation’s long-run capacity to grow. So with this excess demand now, we’re feeling the lag of upward pressure on inflation. And the Fed has raised rates to try to slow nominal spending in the economy.

 

KUDLOW: How high should the target rate go, Mickey, in your judgment?

 

Mr. LEVY: I think we’re going to 5 3/4. And the point is we all want the Fed to be successful, to keep inflation low because we all know that, in the long run, stable low inflation is the best foundation for maximum economic growth and job creation. I think the Fed would like to pause. They kind of gave us a hint of that today. But I think this upward drift in inflation’s baked in the cake….

 

KUDLOW: Well, Wayne Angell… In your era as the Fed board member, we were really more on a commodity-oriented approach to measuring liquidity and inflation fears. Do you think they’ll ever get back to where you guys were in the early ‘90s?

 

Mr. ANGELL: Well, I hope so. Because I’ll tell you what’s going to happen….The real risk is that the Fed let the housing boom go too far, and it’s going to go crashing down…. And so that’s a real risk.

 

Mr. LEVY: Larry, I disagree…. I mean, the fundamentals underlying the housing market are still favorable, and as long as the Fed constrains inflationary expectations, which is an anchor for mortgage rates, housing prices aren’t going to fall like that, Wayne. They’ve never fallen like that, even during the Depression. So look for moderation in housing but that’s it…. The surprise is going to be how resilient the economy is… and how it continues to grow at a healthy pace….

 

 

2. “McClatchy confronts Web challenge” (Sacramento Bee, June 28, 2006); story citing GARY PRUITT (MPP 1981); http://www.sacbee.com/content/business/story/14272467p-15082794c.html

By Dale Kasler -- Bee Staff Writer

 

Gary Pruitt, chairman and chief executive of The McClatchy Co., says newspapers can survive and thrive by combining their print dominance in local markets with traffic on the papers’ Web sites. Sacramento Bee/Michael A. Jones

 

There was a time when Sutter Health relied mainly on classified advertisements in The Bee and other local newspapers when it needed to hire a nurse.

 

Now the hospital chain is more likely to turn to the Internet: nursing sites and help-wanted outfits. On the Web, “we get the candidate pool that we need to reach,” said Debbie Moreno, Sutter’s regional recruitment director.

 

Sutter’s new approach to job recruitment offers a glimpse of the challenges facing newspapers just as The Bee’s parent, The McClatchy Co., completed its purchase Tuesday of Knight Ridder Inc., a historic acquisition that makes McClatchy the nation’s second largest newspaper chain. McClatchy says the deal will nearly triple its revenue and immediately add to cash flow, a measure of profitability.

 

But some analysts believe the deal is loaded with peril. Despite a strong economy, newspaper circulation is falling and most advertising revenue is stagnant.

 

Still, the industry has real strengths: Newspaper profit margins are about twice that of the average Fortune 500 company. And newspaper Web sites attracted more than one in three of all Internet users during the first quarter of 2006, according to a recent study.

 

McClatchy Chairman and Chief Executive Gary Pruitt said problems exist but aren’t overwhelming. “It’s certainly possible that (profits) may decline a little bit,” he said in an interview. “But they may not. It remains a profitable, healthy business.”

 

At risk, though, is the industry’s grip on help-wanted, automotive and other forms of classified advertising -- a segment that until recently generated up to 70 percent of profits, analyst Lauren Rich Fine of Merrill Lynch said in a recent speech. Now, she and others say, papers are losing market share to Web sites like Monster.com and craigslist….

 

Pruitt said classified ads account for less than 70 percent of McClatchy’s profit but they are “critically important.” And he acknowledged that the Web is “a virulent classified competitor.”

 

He also believes newspapers, in tandem with their Web sites, can fight off the infection because of their dominant position in each market they serve.

 

“We’re the local media leader, and we will be able to offer a combination of print and online,” he said. “That’s a combination our competitors can’t offer.”

 

McClatchy is revving up its Web sites with sophisticated search engines so readers can find local advertisers more effectively. It is part owner of two national classified-ad Web sites, including one -- CareerBuilder -- used by Sutter.

 

And, like other publishers, McClatchy is actually giving away some classifieds. The Bee offers free print and online classifieds to anyone selling merchandise priced at $250 or less. The idea is to make sure the paper retains a critical mass of ads to hold onto readers. Pruitt said the freebies are “reflective of increasing competition.”…

 

Total newspaper ad revenue increased 2.5 percent last year, the Newspaper Association of America said. That’s a far cry from the 7 percent increase the industry would normally enjoy in a strong economy, said Goldman Sachs analyst Peter Appert.

 

Yet industry officials say newspaper Web sites are gaining traction. A recent study by the Newspaper Association of America said visitors to newspaper Web sites are more likely than other Internet users to make online purchases. The study polled users of several Web sites, including sacbee.com.

 

Pruitt thinks newspapers and their Web sites can hold their own. Unlike the interlopers, McClatchy has local salespeople -- “feet on the street,” he said -- who can engage advertisers.

 

McClatchy owns a minority stake in Classified Ventures, an Internet company that includes Cars.com and several real estate sites. As part of the Knight Ridder takeover, McClatchy has inherited a one-third stake in CareerBuilder.com, a help-wanted site.

 

The size of the CareerBuilder stake could change because the other two partners have the option of buying McClatchy’s share. More alliances could occur.

 

“Google and Yahoo and Monster may be viewed as competitors today, but one or more of them are likely to be partners tomorrow,” Pruitt said.

 

 

3. “State’s budget called a victory for all sides. Debt reduced, education fully funded -- governor is expected to sign it Friday” (San Francisco Chronicle, June 28, 2006); story citing MIKE GENEST (MPP 1980); http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/06/28/BAGOEJLJV71.DTL&hw=mike+genest&sn=003&sc=425

 

By Lynda Gledhill; Chronicle Sacramento Bureau

 

The state Legislature on Tuesday night approved a $131 billion budget that uses $7.5 billion in unexpected revenue to give victories to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and legislative Democrats and Republicans by funding their key priorities….

 

The 2006-07 spending plan makes major inroads in paying down debt and fully funds education, spends significantly on transportation, and includes cost of living adjustments for poor and elderly people.

 

Despite the bipartisan good will, this budget continues to spend more than it takes in and leaves the state with a $4.5 billion deficit for the 2007-08 fiscal year, said Mike Genest, Schwarzenegger’s finance director….

 

 

4. “Bank of America Chief Economist Mickey Levy Provides Economic Outlook During Congressional Testimony” (PR Newswire US, June 27, 2006); story featuring MICKEY LEVY (MPP 1974).

 

Bank of America Corporation Chief Economist Mickey Levy testified today in Washington, D.C., before the U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee to discuss the 2006-2007 economic outlook and prospects for future economic growth.

 

[From Mr. Levy’s testimony:]

 

The U.S. economy is strong fundamentally, and its sustainable potential growth is the highest of all large industrial nations. The pace of the current expansion is transitioning toward more moderate growth, following a period of robust expansion. This is a natural -- and welcomed -- consequence of the Federal Reserve’s interest rate hikes. I project the economy to grow at a 2.75-3.0 percent pace through year-end 2006 and expand at a healthy pace in 2007. Continued gains in employment will keep the unemployment rate low. Housing activity and prices will flatten, but not fall materially, and consumer spending will continue to rise, albeit at a more moderate pace. Corporate profits and cash flows, already at all-time highs, are expected to rise further, but at a slower pace than the last several years….

 

Several risks face economic performance in 2006-2007. The first is the risk that the Fed inadvertently pushes up interest rates too much, which would generate an economic slump. Presently, this risk is low, and the Fed is well aware of the consequences of tightening monetary policy too much. The second risk is a misguided thrust toward protectionism that could potentially disrupt global trade and capital flows. Congressional authors and supporters of protectionist legislation must be warned that such measures would damage economic performance and hurt many citizens they are intended to help.

 

The high U.S. current account deficit and large surpluses in select foreign nations is largely a reflection of the U.S.’s stronger economic and investment growth and low national saving, and the softer economic performance in most industrialized nations and excess saving relative to investment overseas. Although these global imbalances are large, I believe that factors are in place that will begin to narrow global imbalances, and do not anticipate a jarring decline in the U.S. dollar unless there is a dramatic shift in global economic performance.

 

Sustained healthy economic performance requires coming to grips with the large Federal budget imbalance. Closing the budget gap ultimately requires reforming Social Security, Medicare and the retirement programs by trimming future benefit structures and making them economically rational. Failure to address these issues is a disservice to the citizenry and only increases the eventual costs of adjustment….

 

 

5. “WHO investigation shows H5N1 bird flu virus mutated slightly in Indonesian family cluster” (Associated Press Worldstream, June 24, 2006); story citing TIM UYEKI (MPP 1985).

 

By Margie Mason, AP Medical Writer

 

Jakarta Indonesia -- A World Health Organization investigation showed that the H5N1 virus mutated slightly in an Indonesian family cluster on Sumatra island, but bird flu experts insist it did not increase the possibility of a human pandemic.

 

The virus that infected eight members of a family last month killing seven of them appears to have slightly mutated in a 10-year-old boy, who is then suspected of passing the virus to his father, the WHO investigative report said.

 

It is the first evidence indicating that a person caught the virus from a human and then passed it on to another person, said Tim Uyeki, an epidemiologist from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. He said the H5N1 virus died with the father and did not pass outside the family.

 

“It stopped. It was dead end at that point,” he said, stressing that viruses are always slightly changing and there was no reason to raise alarm….

 

[Dr. William Schaffner, a bird flu expert at the Vanderbilt University] said it is remarkable that scientists were able to discover a mutation that occurred in a remote village in Indonesia. That’s the result of intense surveillance linked with “21st-century laboratory virology,” he said. “That’s awesome.”…

 

Despite the virus’ slight mutation, Uyeki insisted that an analysis suggested there was “nothing remarkable about these viruses.”…

 

 

6. “Limits on eminent domain are approved by Assembly” (Star-Ledger, The (Newark, NJ), June 23, 2006); story citing ROBERT GORDON (MPP 1975); http://www.nj.com/search/index.ssf?/base/news-3/1151037018214350.xml?starledger?nnj&coll=1

 

By Robert Schwaneberg and Steve Chambers; Star-Ledger Staff

 

A bill intended to restrict government’s power to seize private property through eminent domain passed the Assembly yesterday, 52-18. The bill goes to the Senate, where a rival version is pending.

 

Assemblyman John Burzichelli (D-Gloucester) called his bill “a critical and crucial step” toward protecting the rights of property owners while maintaining a vital tool for transforming blighted areas into new ratables.

 

“The fear of New Jerseyans that government is waiting around the corner and on a whim can take their homes is a fear we have to address,” Burzichelli said. He said his bill (A3257) does that by making it harder for government to declare an area “blighted” and subject to condemnation.

 

Assemblyman Robert Gordon (D-Bergen) [the bill’s co-sponsor] said the bill also requires public hearings “at every point of the process” and “greatly” increases compensation to the owners of homes or businesses that are taken by government….

 

 

7. “Voters have power to fix traffic jams. Infrastructure bond could help Bay Area clear top trouble spots” (Inside Bay Area, June 21, 2006); story citing STUART COHEN (MPP 1997); http://www.insidebayarea.com/search/ci_3962038

 

By Erik N. Nelson, Staff Writer

 

The East Bay still dominates the Bay Area’s top-10 list of most-congested freeways, and Silicon Valley can still thank the dot-com bust for keeping it off the list for 2005.

 

This year, however, local transportation officials offered a new twist with their annual congestion report: In November, they said, motorists can fix some of these problem areas by voting for a $20 billion state transportation bond….

 

Caltrans is already in the initial stages of putting in eastbound carpool lanes on the I-580 to reduce congestion, [Alameda County Supervisor Scott Haggerty, who represents the county on the Metropolitan Transportation Commission] explained, and planners hope that by 2012, they will be able to build carpool lanes on the westbound side as well.

 

But some in the Bay Area do question how much good the bond measure would do to solve the area’s congestion headaches.

 

“Adding more highway capacity has typically failed us,” said Stuart Cohen, executive director of the Transportation and Land-use Coalition (TALC), a coalition that advocates for environmental protection and mass transit. “You’ll add a lot more capacity by making major investment in rail than you will by adding one extra lane on 580.”

 

 

8. “Why WiFi? Using Mobile Technology to Create a Sense of Place on Your Main Street” (Main Street News, issue no. 229, June 2006); article by CURT GIBBS (MPP 1977); forthcoming online at http://www.mainstreet.org/content.aspx?page=4628&section=8

By Curt Gibbs

 

LA Councilwoman Jan Perry holds a laptop at the launch of ExperienceLA WiFi Pershing Square.  Photo © Curt Gibbs.

 

…WiFi applications can be used to attract visitors, increase foot traffic, assist local businesses, enhance public safety, and aid public employees.  Communicating through WiFi can benefit neighborhoods and bolster economic development.  Setting up or enhancing public WiFi districts and marketing to individuals with WiFi-enabled devices can help create and define a sense of place….

 

…Everyone is waiting to see how a large-city deployment like Philadelphia or San Francisco will play out….

 

Relatively lost-cost WiFi solutions to connect visitors, workers, and residents to the Internet can be implemented now by Main Street programs at the district level, while looking toward these future, citywide deployments.  By leveraging existing resources and establishing working relationships to achieve common goals, your Main Street will be ready for the future wave of WiFi-enabled visitors.

 

Curt Gibbs is Senior Resource Development Officer at the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles.

 

 

9. “Toyota to Explore Plug-In Hybrids. The Japanese carmaker will make a big push to boost its offering of fuel-efficient vehicles, a top executive says” (Los Angeles Times, June 14, 2006); story citing ROLAND HWANG (MPP 1992); http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-toyota14jun14,1,5609897,print.story

 

By John O’Dell, Times Staff Writer

 

Toyota Motor Corp. said Tuesday that it intended to increase research into plug-in hybrid technology, which it once derided, and to double the number of conventional hybrid models it sells globally by early next decade.

 

The Japanese automaker, poised to overtake General Motors Corp. as the world’s largest automaker by sales volume, presented a far-reaching look at its fuel-efficiency and environmental goals.

 

In addition to increasing to 14 the number of gasoline-electric hybrid models it offers, Toyota said, it planned to offer more-fuel-efficient gasoline engines and to offer its first engines that can burn mixtures of ethanol and gasoline.

 

The moves come as Toyota, like other automakers, gears up to compete in a world of soaring gasoline prices, diminishing supplies of easily obtainable crude oil and increased political and social pressure to reduce oil consumption and auto emissions….

 

Toyota’s plans were not cheered by everyone.

“Don’t tell me about the technologies — tell me how you will use them to reduce global warming pollution,” said Roland Hwang, Berkeley-based vehicle program director for the Natural Resources Defense Council. “That’s what’s missing here.”

 

Toyota has increased its U.S. market share in part by adding large sport utility vehicles and pickups. The bigger trucks are less fuel-efficient than other Toyotas, and the company’s average fuel economy has dropped about 2 miles per gallon in the last decade to 23.5 mpg last year.

 

That’s second-best in the U.S., trailing only Honda Motor Co.’s 25.1 mpg average. “But it still means they’re behind where they were in 1985,” Hwang said, despite Toyota’s introduction of hybrids and other fuel-efficiency technologies….

 

 

10. “AIDS/LifeCycle Rolls Victoriously into Los Angeles, Raising AIDS Awareness, $8 Million for HIV/AIDS Services” (U.S. Newswire, June 10, 2006); story citing MARK CLOUTIER (MPP 1993); http://www.aidslifecycle.org/press/index.html

2,200 Participants in 5th Annual Event Commemorate 25 Years of Battle Against AIDS  Photo credit: Susan Goldman - AIDS/LifeCycle

 

After a week experiencing the physical and emotional challenges of a 585-mile journey from San Francisco to Los Angeles, more than 2,200 participants in AIDS/LifeCycle (ALC) rolled to a victorious finish in West Los Angeles today, having raised over $8 million from 70,000 donors. Money raised from the event will support HIV services provided by the event’s co-producers, the L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center and the San Francisco AIDS Foundation.

 

“In this 25th year of the fight against AIDS, 2,200 participants took a week out of their lives to remind the world

 

that AIDS deserves all our attention,” said Mark Cloutier, executive director of the San Francisco AIDS Foundation. “There are 150,000 Californians living with HIV and an expected 2,000 new infections this year. This money will fund services for those with HIV and support us in new innovative approaches to reduce HIV infections.”

 

AIDS/LifeCycle 5 set a new record for participation and money raised, attracting cyclists from nine countries and 40 states, including a contingent of people living with HIV known as the Positive Pedalers. No other event raises as much money for HIV/AIDS services. The riders, volunteers and thousands of well wishers were welcomed to Los Angeles by Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa….

 

 

11. “Open Forum: Leadership needed for better health-care research” (San Francisco Chronicle, June 9, 2006); op-ed by CHRISTOPHER WOLF (MPP cand. 2007); http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2006/06/09/EDGDOILMAF1.DTL

 

By Christopher Wolf

 

Ask the person next to you if they know of any therapies based on stem cells that have been clinically successful; better yet, ask yourself the same question. Now consider the case, in 2003, of a 16-year-old boy in the United States who had his heart pierced with a 3-inch nail from a nail gun, which caused one of the pumping chambers to fail. In a case such as that, the patient usually would need either a heart transplant or a device to assist the heart in pumping blood.

 

In this case, however, a different approach was taken; namely, the peripheral, the so-called “adult” stem cells, were harvested from the boy’s blood, cultured and subsequently injected into the coronary artery nearest the injury. “Six months later, the patient is attending school and playing basketball with friends,” according to the Genome News Network.

 

Today, three years later… Stem-cell therapies, however, have not made significant headway into the clinical setting….

 

As it stands, the FDA cannot approve new technologies that use human embryonic-stem cells because that would involve federal funding, which President Bush has banned.

 

This lack of federal research may foster private interests to step in and reap the benefits. For example, say a biotech company develops a fundamentally new therapy; given enough marketing and initial capital, such a company could monopolize that portion of regenerative medicine and start hindering any further advances that involve its patented technology. Under such a circumstance, regenerative medicine could become a set of monopolies controlled by corporations and/or other countries.

 

Other countries, most notably South Korea, have invested millions of dollars in stem-cell research, and increase the funding from year to year. They are quite close to matching the state of stem-cell technology in the United States. Suppose one country -- China, say -- using government funding to develop a new clinical therapy based on embryonic-stem cells. Then imagine your doctor telling you, “Well, we might have a shot at treating you, but you have to know that this is new technology for us and we don’t know all the risks involved; plus, you should go to China to have it done correctly.” Doesn’t sound too hot, does it?….

 

Christopher Wolf is a student in the College of Engineering, Department of Bioengineering and the Goldman School of Public Policy at UC Berkeley.

 

[This op-ed was the winner in a writing contest judged by David Kirp and Visiting Professor Ruth Rosen.]

 

 

12. “The fast and the serious - This summer, the multiplex is a good place to study our conflicted relationship with cars” (Times Union, (Albany, NY), June 9, 2006); story citing ROLAND HWANG (MPP 1992).

 

By Mark McGuire, Staff Writer

 

Cars are:

 

(A) Cute and toothy and goofy and fast and funny.

(B) Among the most lethal devices choking our overheated planet.

 

You kinda root for (A), but fear (B) might be closer to the truth. No worries: Hollywood lets you choose.

 

With high gas prices, concerns over terrorism, the war in Iraq and growing worries over global warming, America’s car culture is at, well, a crossroads. But even if you’re thinking of trading in your Lincoln Navigator for a Toyota Prius, the celebration of cars at the multiplex isn’t going away anytime soon….

 

In almost every megaplex in the land, you’ll find “Cars,” the latest feature film from the computer-animation titans at Pixar. The story of a race car that finds itself in a backwater desert town inhabited mostly by clunkers is almost assured to be one of the biggest blockbusters of the summer season….

 

Next week brings two more films concerning cars. The latest installment in the street-racing “Fast and the Furious” franchise, subtitled “Tokyo Drift,” moves the action to Japan. A much more controversial film goes into wider release: “An Inconvenient Truth,” a documentary about Al Gore’s ongoing effort to alert the world to the dangers of global warming a phenomenon, Gore and others argue, for which auto emissions are a contributing (but not a primary) culprit….

 

There’s more: Later this month, in much more limited release, the documentary “Who Killed the Electric Car?” looks at the demise of fuel-efficient vehicles in California, answering its titular question by pointing the finger at the oil and automobile industries, government and even consumers….

 

“It’s a great juxtaposition,” said Roland Hwang, who works on transportation issues as a senior policy analyst for the Natural Resources Defense Council. “I think it’s pretty ironic the `Cars’ movie is coming out as we are coming to increasingly realize the dangers of global warming, and the role cars are playing in it.”

 

“Car culture is amazingly huge in America. It’s a big part of how America works,” said Chris Paine, director of “Who Killed the Electric Car?”

 

Filmgoers shouldn’t worry about seeing their end of the chase scene as we know it. Even ardent environmentalists don’t foresee a day when a devotion to cars becomes an on-screen pariah on the level of smoking or casual racism.

 

“We certainly don’t believe ... that we have to obliterate car culture, that our love affairs with cars can’t continue,” Hwang said.

 

 

13. “Cool 2 Know: It came unplugged. Examining the modest rise and swift demise of GM’s electric car” (Newsday (Long Island, NY), June 21, 2006); story citing ROLAND HWANG (MPP 1992).

 

By Tom Incantalupo, Staff Writer

 

With world attention focused on rising energy costs and Al Gore’s global warming film doing surprisingly well at the box office, a movie like “Who Killed the Electric Car?” looks like it could be a money-maker. Sony Pictures’ new film, due out next week, accuses General Motors of sabotaging its own electric car program in the 1990s, dooming it to failure.

 

But did GM really do what the film claims - scuttle the program in order to protect the corporation’s investment in gasoline engines and to kill a mandate that would have forced it to sell thousands of the electric cars in California?

 

Industry analysts who followed the saga of the GM “EV1” say the film is wrong - that the car’s own shortcomings killed it, not GM’s alleged undermarketing and under-production.

 

Environmentalists, though, tend to view the film as more factually accurate.

 

The EV1 did have its drawbacks, among them a two-seat body style and a range between rechargings of 55 miles to 130 miles (at which point the car would drop dead wherever it was). The 130-mile range was only in later models with better batteries - and then only under optimum conditions. Recharging took at least four hours and as long as eight.

 

“It never had a prayer of becoming a viable vehicle,” said veteran auto analyst David Healy of Burnham Securities….

 

Even environmentalists say it’s unfair to ask a company to lose money indefinitely on a product, especially a company such as GM that has long been under siege from offshore competitors and running in the red at home. “We can’t ask any auto company to build cars if they’re not going to make money on them,” said Roland Hwang, vehicle policy director of the Natural Resources Defense Council, who has seen the film. “There has to be a pathway for them to make a profit on these technologies.”

 

Still, he said he believes GM eventually might have made a go of the EV1 if it had stuck with it longer, as Toyota did with its Prius hybrid, after, analysts believe, losing money on it for years.

 

Hwang thinks the engineers who designed the EV1 and the marketers who tried to sell it made a good-faith effort that was hampered and ultimately killed by GM higher-ups who knew that high sales of the EV1 would weaken their lobbying efforts against the California state electric car mandate, which had been postponed from 1996 and was to have taken effect in 2003. Carmakers objected to being forced to market vehicles for which, in their view, demand was small. “They were not going to be pouring millions into a serious program that would be counterproductive to their own political goals,” Hwang said….

 

 

14. “State to Delay Benefit Rule; U.S. law set to take effect July 1 requires proof of citizenship for Medi-Cal coverage. Officials fear hasty action could bar legitimate enrollees” (Los Angeles Times, June 7, 2006); story citing report authored by DAVID CARROLL (MPP 2000); http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-medicaid7jun07,1,5308499.story

 

By Rong-Gong Lin II, Times Staff Writer

 

State health officials said Tuesday that they will delay enforcement of a controversial federal law intended to keep illegal immigrants from improperly receiving government-funded medical care, fearing that hasty action could imperil coverage of U.S. citizens.

 

The new rule would for the first time require 50 million Medicaid enrollees nationwide to provide identification and proof of citizenship to receive benefits. President Bush signed the regulation into law in February, and it is scheduled to go into effect July 1.

 

Of nearly 7 million Medi-Cal recipients in California, about 650,000 may lack documentation such as birth certificates or passports even though they are legitimately enrolled, according to the California Budget Project [in a report authored by David Carroll], a nonprofit group that studies government policies affecting the poor. About half of all Medi-Cal recipients are children and about 10% are 65 or older….

 

Both federal and California health officials have said there is no evidence that many noncitizens are defrauding Medicaid.

 

It is unclear how many U.S. citizens could inadvertently lose Medicaid eligibility if they are unable to prove their citizenship status. But the challenges are significant: Nearly all of the 50 million Medicaid recipients nationally are citizens, and all will have to submit documentation for the first time in the next year….

 

“No one would want us to send 3.2 million children to the Department of Motor Vehicles to get photo identification,” [Stan Rosenstein of the California health department] said, noting that under the new rules a birth certificate alone, without a photo ID, is insufficient to prove citizenship for a 3-year-old child.

 

[David Carroll’s report, “New Medicaid Documentation Requirement Could Create a Barrier to Health Care,” can be read at: http://www.cbp.org/2006/0605_bb_citdocumentation.pdf ]

 

 

15. “BART loses the way to San Jose. Money to build extension may exist even without failed measure” (Oakland Tribune, June 8, 2006); story citing STUART COHEN (MPP 1997); http://www.insidebayarea.com/search/ci_3912661

 

By Erik N. Nelson, Staff Writer

 

Santa Clara County voters’ rejection of a sales tax measure dealt a crippling blow to plans to extend BART from Fremont to San Jose.

 

Measure A, which would have levied a half-cent sales tax for 30 years for general county expenditures, was defeated Tuesday when 57 percent voted no and 43 percent voted yes.

 

The measure was envisioned as a way to provide consistent funding to operate BART to six stops that would skirt the east side of San Jose at an estimated cost of $4.7 billion.

 

Opponents of the line said the vote showed support for the extension was weaker than backers have maintained.

 

“This sends a very loud and clear message to the power brokers down there that BART is not as popular as they thought,” said Stuart Cohen, executive director of the Transportation and Land Use Coalition, a nonprofit that backs “sustainable and socially just transportation.”…

 

In the eyes of opponents, a path that leads away from BART would be preferable.

 

“They really will have to consider something that is less than $7 billion, which is what this will really cost,” Cohen said, adding the project’s debt service and operating cost to its construction costs.

 

The nearly $2 billion in money already available for the project could be better spent, Cohen said, on a rail service using existing track, perhaps connecting the Tri-Valley area to San Jose on something resembling the Caltrain service that connects San Jose, San Mateo County and San Francisco….

 

 

16. “Lockout at Hospital to End; Contract Talks to Resume” (Knight-Ridder Tribune Business News - The Record (Hackensack, NJ), June 5, 2006); story citing ROBERT GORDON (MPP 1975).

 

Englewood Hospital and Medical Center sent hundreds of nurses into the streets Friday morning in a rare lockout of unionized health-care professionals, after contract talks deadlocked over pension benefits.

 

By afternoon, though, under pressure from state and local leaders, the hospital agreed to end the lockout on Monday morning and the two sides agreed to resume negotiations and extend the current contract for three weeks.

 

It was the end of two days of high drama in hospital-union relations, mirrored by the weather, as scores of nurses endured violent thunderstorms in their vigil outside the hospital.

 

Nearly 150 nurses were turned away from their shifts at 7 a.m. Friday. They were joined by other members of Local 5004 of the Health Professionals and Allied Employees union. They gathered on the sidewalk outside the hospital, chanting, “We want to work.”…

 

A few hours later, hospital administrators met with local public officials and agreed to welcome the nurses back Monday morning.

 

Ann Twomey, president of the 11,000-member union, attributed the swift resolution to “the solidarity of our members and the tremendous support from local, state and national elected officials.”

 

The announcement of the lockout’s planned end followed a meeting between hospital officials and Bergen County Executive Dennis McNerney and Assemblyman Robert Gordon, D-Fair Lawn….

 

 

17. “Officials call rules lax on site cleanups; Want state, not polluter control” (The Record (Bergen County, NJ), June 2, 2006); story citing ROBERT GORDON (MPP 1975); http://www.bergen.com/page.php?qstr=eXJpcnk3ZjcxN2Y3dnFlZUVFeXkyJmZnYmVsN2Y3dnFlZUVFeXk2OTQyNzAw

 

By Alex Nussbaum, Staff Writer, North Jersey Media Group

 

Polluters and developers have too much control over toxic waste cleanups, state lawmakers warned on Thursday.

 

Leaders of the Assembly’s environment and judiciary committees, meeting in a joint session in Trenton, said the state needs to wrest some of the control it had surrendered to polluters. Legislators are concerned that those responsible for contaminating a site get to decide how they will clean it up and that much of the testing of those sites is done by consultants hired by property owners.

 

“A consultant working for a producer of waste is going to feel pressure to provide answers that their client wants,” said Assemblyman Robert Gordon, D-Fair Lawn.

 

The state’s cleanup program has had a series of other mishaps in recent years. In Ringwood, for example, the state allowed a site to be removed from the federal Superfund list even though neighbors complained toxic paint sludge from another Ford plant still littered the area….

 

Environmentalists blame a series of votes by the Legislature in the ‘90s that aimed to speed the cleanup process and encourage redevelopment of polluted “brownfields.”…

 

 

18. “It isn’t all bad news. Digital ventures recruit readers, offset dreary circulation reports” (Times-Tribune, (Scranton, PA), June 11, 2006); story citing GARY PRUITT (MPP 1981).

 

By Jeff Sonderman Staff Writer

 

Each time a new report emerges about declining newspaper circulation, pessimistic prognosticators declare the industry one step closer to extinction.

 

The industry’s latest wallop came in May, when a report showed newspaper sales nationwide down 2.5 percent in six months.

 

Weekday newspaper sales dropped 12.4 percent from 1990 to 2004, according to the industry journal Editor & Publisher.

 

Other industry insiders, however, say things just aren’t as bad as the circulation numbers suggest.

 

“The fact is, newspapers are still among the best media businesses,” Gary Pruitt, chairman and chief executive of the McClatchy Co., wrote in a recent op-ed article in The Wall Street Journal.

 

The Sacramento-based company is investing $4.5 billion to buy Knight Ridder Inc., the nation’s second-largest newspaper chain. It will keep 20 and resell 12….

 

Mr. Pruitt noted that newspaper audiences are actually growing when online readers are included.

 

“While it may seem counterintuitive to suppose that a company founded before the advent of electric lights would be a media leader in the age of blogs, podcasts and text messaging, that’s exactly what has happened,” Mr. Pruitt wrote….

 

 

19. “Study: Too little enterprise in business tax-break zones: Payouts, Not Benefits, Up Dramatically” (San Jose Mercury News, April 18, 2006); story citing study by DAVID CARROLL (MPP 2000).

 

By Chris O’Brien, San Jose Mercury News, Calif.

 

An economic policy think tank issued a report [authored by David Carroll] Monday asserting that the state’s enterprise zone program offers too many tax breaks to businesses while doing little to help the economy.

 

The California Budget Project, an independent analysis group in Sacramento, said the amount of revenue being lost by the state under the program ballooned to $299.3 million in 2003 -- up from just $15.6 million in 1993. Overall, the program has doled out $1.5 billion in tax breaks since it was created in the mid-1980s, according to a report titled “California’s Enterprise Zones Miss The Mark.”…

 

The Budget Project called on the state agency that administers the program and the Legislature to sharply reduce the number of enterprise zones -- currently 42 -- and more carefully target benefits so that only the most economically distressed areas are eligible. The zones aren’t sufficiently targeted, with one in eight California employees working in an enterprise zone, the think tank said.

 

“The cost of the program has skyrocketed, yet the effectiveness of the tax breaks is tenuous, at best, and companies claim tax breaks without demonstrating that they create new jobs,” the report said….

 

The Budget Project asserted that the program has a number of flaws:

 

• The zones are often too big, especially in cities such as San Francisco and Los Angeles.

 

• The zones frequently are far from economically distressed.

 

• The tax credit for hiring certain types of workers is too easily abused by companies that are able to use it even while hiring employees who would not necessarily have a hard time finding work due to disability or some other barrier.

 

• Some businesses have engaged in “forum shopping” by locating in one enterprise zone but applying for hiring vouchers in other zones….

 

[Jean Ross, executive director of the Budget Project] noted that in the case of the tax credit for hiring, companies could get rewarded for hiring some employees even while firing others. As a result, it would be to a company’s advantage to increase “churn” so it could gain a tax advantage….

 

In fact, even before the report was issued Monday, enterprise zones had come under scrutiny and are probably headed for changes….

 

[Other stories citing the report appeared in The San Diego Union-Tribune, (Long Beach) Press-Telegram, Fresno Bee, etc.]

 

[David Carroll’s report, “California’s Enterprise Zones Miss the Mark,” can be read at:  http://www.cbp.org/2006/0604_ezreport.pdf ]

 

 

20. “Testimony delivered April 6 before House Subcommittee on Labor-HHS-Education appropriations, to discuss NCI budget request for Fiscal year 2007” (States News Service, April 6, 2006); story citing RICHARD TURMAN (MPP 1987).

 

By John E. Niederhuber, M.D., Deputy Director, National Cancer Institute, and Richard Turman, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Budget, Department of Health and Human Services

 

Four years ago, we put the NCI on a trajectory towards the Challenge Goal of eliminating suffering and death due to cancer as early as the year 2015. Since that time, we have vigorously and aggressively managed NCI’s portfolio of investments in cancer research across that entire continuum of the process of cancer, whether we’ve been focusing on understanding genetic mutations that were responsible for susceptibility to cancer or focusing on issues that have to do with survivorship and living with, rather than dying from, cancer….

 

A RECORD OF REAL SUCCESS

 

The past year in cancer research shows a record of substantial and heartening achievement. We are expanding our foundation of knowledge and the technical tools with which rapid advances can be made in understanding the mechanisms of cancer. We are exponentially increasing the opportunities to manage this lethal disease. Building on NCI-funded research, large-scale clinical trials in 2005 yielded results that will have profound effects in preventing and treating many cancers.

 

For example, three different clinical trials showed that adding trastuzumab (Herceptin) to standard adjuvant chemotherapy significantly reduced the risk of recurrence in women with the early-stage breast cancer…. Approximately 50,000 women in the United States are diagnosed with HER-2/neu positive breast cancer each year, representing about 20% of invasive breast cancers.

 

Equally stunning results were seen in the trial of a vaccine that protects against two strains of human papillomavirus (HPV) that cause over 70% of cervical cancers, a disease that kills more than 200,000 women each year, including many in developing countries….

 

In January, an NCI-sponsored trial reported that women who received chemotherapy directly in their abdomens as part of treatment for advanced ovarian cancer lived more than a year longer than women who received the same chemotherapy intravenously…. Ovarian cancer causes the most deaths of any gynecological cancer in the United States and frequently goes undetected until tumors spread beyond the ovaries.

 

Another notable advance came last September with the announcement of results from the NCI-sponsored Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST). The study found that digital mammography is more accurate than film mammography for women with dense breasts, as well as for several other groups of women, including women under 50 and pre- and perimenopausal women….

 

Finally, NCI has made strides to address the widespread disparities in cancer screening, treatment, and care for disadvantaged, mostly minority populations….

 

CONCLUSION

 

We must do more to continue the acceleration of discovery, development, and delivery of the interventions that will hasten the transformation of our traditional view of cancer as a death sentence into a disease that we can prevent, eliminate, or control. This will be the legacy we leave our children.

 

…We are committed to face the challenge of making difficult choices between those programs that we will continue to grow and nurture and those that have already advanced our knowledge. The decisions will be science driven. This is an unprecedented era of discovery. The opportunities to apply powerful new technologies to advance our knowledge and the opportunities to change the course of cancer have never been greater.

 

John E. Niederhuber, M.D.

Richard J. Turman

 

 

21. “Housing Needs of Many Low-Income Hurricane Victims Remain Unmet; Study Outlines Additional Federal Steps Needed” (U.S. Newswire, February 23, 2006); story citing study by WILL FISCHER (MPP 1999).

 

Washington—The federal government has not done enough to meet the housing needs of poor residents affected by the 2005 hurricanes, according to a new analysis from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, which also details several policy recommendations for Congress in this area.

 

“The rebuilding from the hurricanes has only begun,” said Will Fischer, the report’s primary author. “But the course that has been charted to date indicates that many low-income hurricane victims will not be provided the means to return home and secure housing that they can afford.”

 

The storms’ immediate devastation displaced rich and poor alike, the report explains, but higher-income households are much better equipped than lower-income households to rebuild their lives because they are much more likely to have insurance, significant non-housing assets, and the ability to obtain private loans. The federal government has done little to address the serious problems that low-income households face in these areas….

 

The report recommends that Congress take the following steps:

 

● Have HUD, not FEMA, provide continuing rental assistance to disaster victims….

 

● Help owners repair easily fixed apartments in the disaster area. FEMA’s primary strategy for making housing available in damaged areas has been to install trailers. This has occurred at an extremely slow pace….

 

● Restore the pre-hurricane supply of federally subsidized housing….

 

● Authorize additional housing vouchers to ensure that a share of rebuilt private housing is affordable to poor households….

 

● Help low-income homeowners repair or replace damaged homes….

 

If these funds are not provided, many households—and particularly low-income households—would not be able to rebuild or replace their homes. As a result, tens of thousands of low-income, disproportionately African-American households would be left with their primary asset destroyed and little means of restoring it….

 

The full report can be accessed at: http://www.cbpp.org/2-23-06hous.pdf

 

 

22. “Analyst questions impact of Katrina grants on low-income in Miss.” (Associated Press State & Local Wire, January 25, 2006); story citing WILL FISCHER (MPP 1999).

 

By Valerie Bauman, Associated Press Writer

 

Jackson Miss.—An analyst for a Washington think tank says he’s concerned about how Mississippi will distribute the $5.1 billion the federal government has given the state to help homeowners rebuild after Hurricane Katrina. 

 

Will Fischer, senior policy analyst for the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, said Wednesday that Republican Gov. Haley Barbour’s plan for rebuilding the hurricane-ravaged Gulf Coast favors homeowners and might leave out renters, low-income families and those living on fixed incomes. “I think these are people who are affected by the hurricane, just like homeowners are,” Fischer told members of the Mississippi House Ways and Means Committee.  Fischer said the governor’s plan … will make it more difficult for low-income families to find affordable housing on the coast.

 

Barbour told lawmakers earlier this month that the federal money would be used to give homeowners grants of up to $150,000….  Homeowners who receive the federal grants must agree to meet stringent building code standards when they rebuild, Barbour said.

 

Those new standards will cost homeowners a lot of money and will drive up the price of rental properties, Fischer said.  “The people who are going to be left in the lurch are low-income people,” Fischer said.  Rental units make up 30 percent of housing on the Mississippi coast, Fischer said.

 

The problem is that all property owners will be given funding based on the pre-Katrina value of their homes or apartment buildings, but they will be required to rebuild to a new standard that will cost more money, he said. This will create more costs for property owners and renters.

 

Fischer encouraged legislators consider bills that would accommodate low- and moderate-income families….  Federal law requires that as little as 25 percent of the funding could be applied to low and moderate income families, Fischer said….

 

 

FACULTY IN THE NEWS

Back to top

1. “Berkeley: Bush impeach resolution on ballot. Overwhelming support as council OKs measure” (San Francisco Chronicle, June 29, 2006); story citing HENRY BRADY; http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/06/29/BAGDHJM8JV1.DTL&type=printable

 

By Carolyn Jones, Chronicle Staff Writer

 

With resolutions and proclamations, left-leaning cities and counties across the United States have started a drumbeat calling for the impeachment of President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney.

Now Berkeley has taken it one step further.

 

With overwhelming support from Berkeley residents, the Berkeley City Council unanimously passed a resolution Tuesday night to be the first jurisdiction in the United States to let the public vote for the president’s impeachment. The measure will appear on the Nov. 7 ballot, at a cost of about $10,000….

 

“I don’t think it’s a laughable idea,” said UC Berkeley political science and public policy Professor Henry Brady. “This is a president with a 35 to 40 percent approval rating. They shouldn’t be laughing.”

 

But impeachment might not be the way to go, Brady said. While voters may be frustrated with the Bush administration, impeachment should not be taken lightly.

 

“Bush may have made many, many policy errors, but it’s questionable whether he’s committed high crimes and misdemeanors,” he said. “I think we’ve been too quick to talk about impeachment for the past 20 years.”

 

A more effective way to fight the White House is to pressure representatives to tackle some of these issues, Brady said.

 

“The bigger picture is that people are upset about Bush and not quite sure how to deal with it,” he said. “But they should pressure Congress to hold hearings on what’s gone wrong.”…

 

 

2. “Raising a $60 billion question” (San Francisco Chronicle [*requires registration], June 28, 2006); story citing ROBERT MacCOUN; http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/06/28/BUGVJJLAU41.DTL&type=printable

 

By David Lazarus

 

Warren Buffett has made clear over the years that he invests for the long haul and that he always does his homework before putting his money to work.

 

So what does that say about Buffett’s decision to give away the bulk of his $44 billion estate to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which is committed to improving health care in the developing world and education in the United States....

 

The danger, of course, is that a private-sector entity with the economic heft of the Gates Foundation will be in a position to hijack the public-policy agenda....

 

What if, for example, the Gates Foundation decides that malaria is a higher priority than AIDS? How would governments worldwide respond? And how would this impact the pharmaceutical industry, which historically has focused its research efforts on areas that hold the greatest promise of profit?

 

“These are good questions,” said Robert MacCoun, a professor of public policy at UC Berkeley. “We’re really in uncharted territory here, and it’s very hard to see how this is going to play out.”

 

He emphasized that, to date, the Gates Foundation “has shown itself to have noble interests.” But MacCoun said it’s not hard to imagine the foundation “taking an interest in more controversial topics.”...

 

MacCoun said it’s difficult to comprehend the influence a $60 billion private-sector foundation will have on world affairs.

 

“They could put a topic on the map and everybody else could end up following because this is what the Gates Foundation is interested in,” he said. “Conversely, some governments might cut back on spending for certain things because they’ll figure that the Gates Foundation is involved.”...

 

 

3. “Housing bubble deflating” Commentary by ROBERT REICH (Marketplace, National Public Radio, June 28, 2006); Listen to this commentary at: http://marketplace.publicradio.org/shows/2006/06/28/PM200606287.html

 

By Robert B. Reich

 

…It’s better that bubbles leak than burst…. But the housing boom has been so large and so important to the American economy over the past five years that even this slow leak will cause severe headaches. One will be for millions of households that have turned their growing home values into piggy banks to finance their continued consumption. Well, that easy route to cash is just about gone.

 

The inevitable result will be less consumption, which will mean fewer jobs.

 

A more immediate problem will arise for all the people making, financing and selling houses…. According to Moody’s Economy.com, housing-related employment has accounted for almost a quarter of the 5 million jobs that have appeared since 2003.

 

But with the boom over, many of these jobs will be over, too. In other words, without the housing bubble, the American economy will lose a lot of its fizz. I don’t like bubbles, but from a jobs standpoint this recovery has needed all the fizz it can get.

 

Which brings us to Ben Bernanke and his gang at the Federal Reserve Board Open Market Committee, which meets tomorrow. It’s an open secret they’re planning to raise interest rates yet again, because they think the economy is too fizzy and still prone to inflation. I hope they listen carefully.

 

The hissing sound they hear is air escaping the housing bubble. There’s less fizz in the economy than they think. Raise interest rates and the Fed raises the likelihood the economy will deflate.

 

 

4. “Robert Reich and Steve Moore debate whether conservatives are happier than liberals” (Kudlow & Company, CNBC News, June 27, 2006); features commentary by ROBERT REICH.

 

LARRY KUDLOW, host: Let’s bring in our dynamic duo. Robert Reich, he’s former labor secretary, professor of public policy at the University of California-Berkeley. Steve Moore, senior economics writer for The Wall Street Journal editorial board. 

 

Gentleman, let me just set this up for you. Arthur C. Brooks, yesterday’s Wall Street Journal said basically conservatives are happier adults than liberals. He says, “Conservative Americans are twice as likely as liberals to attend a house of worship.” And then he goes on to say, “Voluminous research on happiness has shown that religious people are much happier about their lives and futures than nonreligious people.”

 

Robert Reich, your take, conservatives happier?

 

Mr. REICH: Well, I don’t know this. Generalizations don’t make any sense to me. I mean, I am a yuk a minute. I am much happier than either of you guys. I have a very delightful life. I mean, what are we talking about here? It is true that liberals and progressives in general, if one can generalize, tend to see more complexity and have a little bit more appreciation for uncertainties. I mean, you have a lot of conservatives, and I dare say, and it’s real risky for me to say, a lot of very religious people who have a lot of certainty about what is life all about and where they ought to be going and what the answers are to everything, and I think that certainty does breed a certain stability and maybe even a certain contentedness. That doesn’t mean that they’re necessarily happier….

 

Mr. MOORE: Well, first of all, the reason Reich is happier than you and I is because he makes more money than we do, and that just proves that money buys happiness.

 

Mr. REICH: I doubt it very much. I’m happier because I’m in California…. California is the happy place. It’s euphoric.

 

Mr. MOORE: Here’s the explanation for this, Larry. Conservatives are optimistic about the future. It’s not just about religion. It’s about the idea that the future is going to be better than the past. If you listen to the liberals and Al Gore, they’re--all the world is coming to an end, we’re all going to be underwater, the rich are getting rich and the poor are getting poor….

 

Mr. REICH: ...Can I… may I respectfully disagree with my good friend, my happy friend, Steve Moore, and say that I occasionally, when I am feeling a little bit downcast, I read the editorial pages of The Wall Street Journal, and I… see nothing but bile, anger. If I listen to some of the conservative talk-show hosts, it’s anger, it’s negativism, it’s just… life is awful. People are awful. I mean, … I am an optimist. I am upbeat…. I mean, I don’t--we don’t--liberals and progressives, they don’t indulge in that kind of character assassination, that kind of negative poisonous stuff….

 

 

5. “Companies Resist Bid to Limit Emissions. State lawmakers will consider a bill to address global warming with industry mandates” (Los Angeles Times, June 26, 2006); story citing study led by MICHAEL HANEMANN; http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-greenhouse26jun26,0,5235168,print.story

By Marc Lifsher, Times Staff Writer

Sacramento -- An ambitious effort to combat global warming in California comes before a state Senate committee today as the state’s most powerful business groups step up their efforts to kill it.

At issue is a bill by Assembly Speaker Fabian Nuñez (D-Los Angeles) that would require industries to report how much greenhouse gas currently an unregulated source of pollution they produce and accept caps on emissions beginning in 2012....

Environmentalists say the bill to be heard by the state Senate Environmental Quality Committee this afternoon would put teeth in the governor’s pledge to slash greenhouse emissions.

Proponents also note that hitting the governor’s pollution reduction targets would create as many as 20,000 jobs and add $59 billion to the state’s gross product by 2020, according to a January study by UC Berkeley [scientists led by Michael Hanemann]....

 

[The UC Berkeley study, “Managing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in California” is available at: http://calclimate.berkeley.edu/managing_GHGs_in_CA.html ]

 

 

6. Anderson Cooper 360 Degrees: Fires and Global Warming” (CNN News, Aired June 26, 2006 - 23:00 ET); features interview with MICHAEL HANEMANN; http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0606/26/acd.02.html

 

COOPER: …As we speak, acreage is currently burning in several western states right now. These are pictures from today. One thousand tourists at the Grand Canyon’s north rim have been stranded -- 1,000. The only road out is blocked by wildfires. They’re not in physical danger, we are told.

 

More on the possible wildfire and the global warming connection, if there is any, CNN’s Rob Marciano.

 

ROB MARCIANO, CNN METEOROLOGIST (voice-over): In New Mexico, a 2,300 acre blaze forced residents from their homes.

 

Near Sedona, Arizona, a 4,200 acre blaze threatens homes and hundreds have been evacuated….

 

MARCIANO: Just the start of fire season, and already 3.3 million acres blackened in the United States this year. That’s nearly three times as much as this time last year. And it’s expected to get worse.

 

MICHAEL HANEMANN, [UC BERKELEY PROFESSOR and] DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA CLIMATE CHANGE CENTER: It’s going to get hotter in the Southwest. It’s going to get hotter, for example, throughout California. And that means more droughts, more wildfire in the summer.

 

MARCIANO: Michael Hanemann is the director of the California Climate Change Center. He says global warming is causing drought and drought is causing fires.

 

HANEMANN: We know the National Academy of Sciences reported on Friday that the last decade is clearly warmer than the previous 400 years. And these fires and the drought are associated with that unusual increase in warming.

 

MARCIANO: The Southwest is hot, but part of a bigger trend. This April was the hottest on record in the United States. And in the Southwest, the high temperatures make it even drier because the warm air pulls moisture from the ground. And that means more fires. Right now, wildfires are burning in 11 states.

 

And although we can’t blame the recent wet weather in the Northeast on global warming, Hanemann says climate patterns all across the planet could change with rising temperatures in ways we don’t yet understand.

 

HANEMANN: Moving forward, I think we can expect to see increasing extremes, increasing variation in climate as a result of climate change.

 

MARCIANO: Hanemann says unless developed countries get serious about global warming, we can expect the worst. More fires and flooding.

 

HANEMANN: If we take action now, we will prevent I think really nasty consequences in the second part of this century. And if we don’t take action now, I think we will experience really nasty consequences in the second half of this century….

 

 

7. “California sets ethanol goals, but pumps are scarce” (Contra Costa Times [*requires registration], June 25, 2006; story citing DAN KAMMEN; http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/email/news/14899371.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp

By Betsy Mason, Contra Costa Times

With only one public ethanol fuel station, California lags behind other states. But the stage is set for it to reclaim its customary leading role when it comes to green fuels and emission standards.

The governor has recommended sharp reductions in emissions, a goal that could be met in part by replacing gas with ethanol. A November ballot initiative could provide subsidies for ethanol stations. And state use of a 6 percent ethanol gasoline additive has spurred construction of local ethanol production plants....

California may be the leader in this, but we will influence other Western states and then the other coast and eventually the middle of the country,” said UC Berkeley’s Dan Kammen, one of the authors of the alternative energy ballot initiative.

That measure calls for a state oil production tax of 1.5 to 6 percent, depending on oil prices. It would generate $4 billion toward cutting fossil fuel use by 25 percent over the next decade. Some of that could be used as subsidies to offset the cost of converting gas pumps to ethanol.

“The only thing that’s really holding us back is infrastructure,” Kammen said.

 

 

8. “Poplar trees and grass may make fine gas for cars” (Contra Costa Times [*requires registration)], June 24, 2006); story citing DAN KAMMEN and study co-authored with MICHAEL O’HARE and BRIAN TURNER (MPP 2005); http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/news/breaking_news/14896223.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp

By Betsy Mason, Contra Costa Times

Poplar trees and switch grass are on track to become important weapons in national security defense, and a Walnut Creek lab is speeding them on their way.

The Joint Genome Institute, best known for the Human Genome Project, is betting genetic research can make those plants ideal for producing ethanol, grain alcohol that can be used as vehicle fuel. Today, most ethanol is fermented from corn, but scientists say switching to the other plants could give it the boost it needs to significantly reduce U.S. dependency on foreign oil....

“With ethanol we’re paying American farmers, not oil sheiks in the Middle East for our fuel,” said Daniel Kammen, a professor at UC Berkeley’s Energy and Resources Group and the Goldman School Of Public Policy....

In his State of the Union address in January, the president renewed the push for energy independence by calling for a 75 percent reduction in U.S. oil imports by 2025, largely by replacing it with homegrown ethanol. Genetic research at JGI could go a long way toward achieving that, Kammen said.

In January, Kammen co-authored [with Michael O’Hare and Brian Turner (MPP 2005)] a study in the journal Science that put to rest a long debate about whether it takes more energy to produce a gallon of ethanol than a car could get out of it. The study concluded ethanol from corn does have a positive energy balance, and that switching to grass or trees could make it more cost efficient.

Kammen believes switching to a dedicated energy crop is critical. “The problem with corn is the way we grow it in the U.S. right now is very fossil-fuel and fertilizer intensive,” he said. “We have a system that is very well optimized not caring about how much fuel is going in and how much carbon dioxide is coming out.”

 

9. “On the Grid. Solar power finally took off once it plugged into the larger electrical system” (East Bay Express, June 21, 2006); story citing DAN KAMMEN; http://eastbayexpress.com/Issues/2006-06-21/summer/summerarts3.html

                       

                        Cal solar expert Dan Kammen has rigged up his own home. Photo © Mark Gartland

 

By Laura Counts

 

Liz Horowitz of Berkeley installed her solar electric system to salve her anger at “those greedy bastards at the utilities and energy companies.” Dahv Kliner of San Ramon got one partly to assuage his guilt over wanting a hot tub. “They turned it on September 11, 2001,” said Kliner, a research scientist at Sandia National Labs, who line-dries his clothes to offset the spa. “Everyone was watching airplanes hit the World Trade Center, but I don’t have a television so I was watching my meter run backward.”…

                         

 

It’s not off-the-grid hippies who have fueled the new solar boom. It’s the availability of systems connected to the power grid that has made solar practical for homeowners. Back when [Gary Gerber, president of Berkeley’s Sun Light and Power] started out, “going solar” essentially meant installing a sun-heated hot water system. Thanks to then-Governor Jerry Brown and President Jimmy Carter, state and federal tax credits were a generous 55 percent, but consumer options were limited. Solar electric systems were prohibitively expensive, more suited to remote uses like satellites and emergency call boxes than in the home.

 

That was changing by the mid-1990s, when home systems consisting of an array of photovoltaic panels and an inverter that converts the direct current they produce to the alternating current of the grid came to market. In 1996, California enacted its net-metering law, which lets solar customers send their excess electricity back into the grid at peak times, and draw on it when the sun is not shining. Two years later, the state adopted the Emerging Renewables Program, offering hefty rebates that decrease as solar gets more popular. Those programs, combined with Y2K fears and then the so-called energy crisis of 2001, helped push solar over the hump….

 

“We are paying a lot of money for that small amount of energy spilling back to the grid. The idea is that if you offer a subsidy to customers that install solar, then some day the industry will grow enough not to need it,” [said PG&E spokesman Paul Moreno].

 

That’s the way it’s going in Japan and Germany, which are way ahead of the United States in solar use, said UC Berkeley professor Dan Kammen, a solar expert who directs the Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory. Last year, Japan phased out its subsidies, although the very high costs of energy there have made the costs of installing solar easier to justify.

 

Solar advocates say arguments such as PG&E’s ignore the fact that solar users are forking over thousands of dollars to install their systems, decreasing the amount of greenhouse gases produced, and sending energy to the grid. A bill pending in the state legislature will increase the 1996 limit on the amount of energy solar customers can put into the grid — the net metering law capped solar at 0.5 percent of overall peak power generation. Solar customers are likely to exceed that this year. The pending bill raises the cap to 2.5 percent.

 

Even with the 0.5 percent cap, Kammen swears it was solar that made enough of a difference to keep the grid running during the 2001 blackouts. “I’m considered a diehard socialist by most of my friends,” he said. “But in this case, if you didn’t start with a subsidy for the most affluent you would never get any action.”…

 

 

10. “50 People Who Matter” (Business 2.0, CNN Money.com, July 2006 issue, posted June 21, 2006); STEPHEN MAURER is named to top 50 list; http://money.cnn.com/magazines/business2/peoplewhomatter/index.html

 

Rank: 41

Stephen Maurer and Andrej Sali

Adjunct associate professor, University of California at Berkeley, and professor, University of California at San Francisco

Why They Matter: The magic of open-source lies in the notion that patents and other intellectual property rights aren’t always the most effective incentives to promote innovation. The idea has been proven out in the software world, but it’s now spreading to other, arguably more important realms, such as pharmaceutical research. And for that, Maurer and Sali deserve much of the credit. These two academics launched the Tropical Disease Initiative to organize computational biologists working on cures for ailments like malaria, tuberculosis, and dengue fever. The results will be put in the public domain, where clinical researchers can use them to guide their own work. Big Pharma likes the idea as well: Though there have been no formal announcements yet, some of the most prominent names in the industry are already donating laboratory resources to support the effort.

 

 

11. “LHS grad lauded for initiative. Berkeley professor named one of ‘50 Who Matter Now’” (Lawrence Journal-World [KS], June 27, 2006); story citing STEPHEN MAURER.

 

By Mark Fagan

 

Business and financial big-timers Steve Jobs, Ben Bernanke, Bill Gates, Oprah Winfrey and Jeff Bezos now can add another industry accolade to their already sparkling résumés.

 

They finally share a list with Lawrence High School alumnus Stephen Maurer.

 

Maurer, who attended Hillcrest School, West Junior High School and graduated in 1975 from LHS, was listed this month among the “50 Who Matter Now,” a roster of the most important people in business as determined by Business 2.0 Magazine….

 

Stephen Maurer, an adjunct associate professor at the University of California at Berkeley, shares the No. 41 ranking with Andrej Sali, a professor at the University of San Francisco. The two academics have launched the Tropical Disease Initiative, designed to help foster an open-source approach to drug development.

 

The goal: Just as open sourcing has promoted innovation in the world of software engineering, the initiative looks to link computational biologists to develop drugs to fight malaria, tuberculosis, dengue fever, leishmaniasis and other tropical diseases….

 

 

12. “California Sets ‘Clean Energy’ Oil Tax on Ballot” (New York Times Online [*requires registration], June 21, 2006; story citing DAN KAMMEN; http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/washington/politics-energy-california-ballot.html?pagewanted=print

 

By Reuters

 

Los Angeles (Reuters) - Californians will vote in November on a ballot measure proposing a constitutional amendment that would tax oil production to fund a range of alternative energy efforts, Secretary of State Bruce McPherson said on Wednesday....

 

Opponents say the initiative is a sheep in wolves’ clothing that if passed will create an unchecked bureaucracy and not only higher taxes but also higher fuel prices in the end.

 

“In the absence of a federal energy policy, the oil companies have a business-as-usual plan for California’s energy future: higher gas prices, more pollution and greater dependence on insecure foreign sources of oil,’’ said Dan Kammen, Professor of Public Policy at the University Of California at Berkeley and founding director of the Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory there....

 

California is third in the United States in oil production and requires no tax on oil companies for extracting natural resources, unlike Alaska (15 percent tax), Texas (4.6 percent), and Louisiana (12.5 percent), according to Californians For Clean Alternative Energy.

 

If voters approve the ballot measure, the state will get new revenue of between $200 million to $380 million annually from a tax of 1.5 percent to 6 percent on oil production, according to the state’s nonpartisan legislative analyst [headed by Elizabeth Hill (MPP 1975)].

 

The money would fund research and development of alternative energy including solar and wind power and electric and hydrogen-fueled cars. Both public and private organizations will be eligible for funds….

 

 

13. “Forget inflation, that’s deflation looming. Commentator ROBERT REICH warns Fed Chief Ben Bernanke not to become too focused on inflation and miss possible warning signs of deflation” (Marketplace, National Public Radio, June 21, 2006); listen to the commentary at: http://marketplace.publicradio.org/shows/2006/06/21/AM200606211.html

 

Tess Vigeland: Will they or won’t they? That is the question when it comes to whether or not the Federal Reserve will raise interest rates yet again. The Fed meets next week and is expected to hike the benchmark federal funds rate for the 17th time in a row. Mostly on inflation worries. Marketplace commentator and former labor secretary ROBERT REICH says there is something to fret over, but it is not inflation....

 

ROBERT REICH: Ben Bernanke and his Federal Reserve remember the double-digit inflation of the 1970s and are determined to mount a preemptive strike.

 

They don’t have a direct memory of the trauma that haunted the previous generation, the depression of the 1930s. Each generation, in its determination to avoid the nightmare it does remember, runs the danger of overreacting.

 

A generation ago, they paid too little attention to inflationary forces, so Paul Volcker who was then Fed chairman, had to break the back of inflation and thereby put the economy into a severe recession.

 

Now Bernanke and company are paying too little attention to deflationary forces building in America and the global economy....

 

Tess Vigeland: Robert Reich teaches public policy at the University of California at Berkeley….

 

 

14. “With State Coffers Full, Firms Seek Tax Breaks. Businesses seeking concessions on gas fees and the cost of making movies find a willing ally in Democratic Assembly Speaker Fabian Nuñez. But the campaign faces opposition from Republicans” (Los Angeles Times, June 14, 2006); story citing JOHN ELLWOOD; http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-taxbreaks14jun14,1,2084852,print.story?coll=la-headlines-california

 

By Evan Halper, Times Staff Writer

 

Sacramento — Unions, school groups and advocates for the poor aren’t the only ones clamoring for the extra cash that has state coffers overflowing for the first time in years — California’s biggest corporations are angling for the money too....

 

Despite the extra cash the state has lying around this year, multibillion-dollar deficits are still projected well into the future. Any tax breaks passed will cause next year’s shortfall to grow, putting pressure on legislators to cut government programs next year. And the surge in revenue could be fleeting. The new revenues would quickly evaporate if the stock market has a bad year or the housing market collapses.

 

“These additional revenues are all bubble revenues,” said UC Berkeley professor of public policy John Ellwood, “that are coming from stock market gains and the housing market. They could disappear tomorrow.”...

 

 

15. “Tomorrow’s Forecast: Eight ways to beat the heat” (Los Angeles Times, June 11, 2006); op-ed by DAN KAMMEN; http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-op-chart11jun11,1,1948091,full.story

 

By Daniel M. Kammen

 

There is no single solution to global warming, but renewable, clean energy sources abound, and so do the technologies to put them to use. Here are eight strategies and power sources that can help “fix” global warming, along with their costs now and in the future. If we act, it is very possible to reach the goal of reducing greenhouse emissions 80% over the next 50 years.

 

The Fix: $30-per-ton carbon-emissions tax….

 

A carbon-emissions tax would make every other “fix” on this list more practical and effective. Taxing carbon emissions, and using the revenues to develop clean energy sources, discourages greenhouse gas production and encourages investments in alternative energy sources. It could be balanced by a reduction in income taxes or other taxes. Many experts figure a $30-per-ton tax would “reorient” the U.S. economy without harming it.

 

The Fix: Energy efficiency….

 

The technologies are readily available, from compact fluorescent lighting to efficient water heaters. Based on the example of California, where aggressive efficiency standards already are in place, all states could cut energy use by 40% or more. Setting standards requires political leadership, and efficiency isn’t a one-time fix — there must be incentives and investment for continual improvement….

 

DANIEL M. KAMMEN, a professor at UC Berkeley, is founding director of the Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory (rael.berkeley.edu.) and co-director of the Berkeley Institute of the Environment.

 

 

16. “The Numbers Guy: Digging Into the Ethanol Debate” (Wall Street Journal [*requires subscription], June 9, 2006); column citing DAN KAMMEN and study co-authored with MICHAEL O’HARE and BRIAN TURNER (MPP 2005); http://online.wsj.com/article/SB114970102238673892.html

 

By Carl Bialik, Columnist

 

President Bush announced in his State of the Union address in January that he backed funding for research into producing ethanol from corn and other farm products, with the goal of making a viable fuel alternative to gasoline for automobiles. Since then, Congress has wrangled over how to implement the idea....

 

Two prominent researchers are chiefly responsible for the energy-efficiency claim: Cornell University’s David Pimentel and Tad Patzek of the University of California, Berkeley. In a co-written paper published last year in Natural Resources Research, Profs. Pimentel and Patzek wrote, “Ethanol production using corn grain required 29% more fossil energy than the ethanol fuel produced.” By comparison, production of gasoline or diesel uses about 20% more fossil energy than the fuels produce. (For automobiles, ethanol is generally blended with gasoline in either 90-10 or 85-15 proportions, but the studies focused on the energy content of the ethanol itself.)

 

But the analysis stacks the deck against ethanol in a number of ways….

 

When prompted by their students to investigate biofuels, Berkeley Energy and Resources Professors Dan Kammen and Alex Farrell discovered the sharp disagreements among researchers. “It became pretty clear to us, as we were getting up to speed on ethanol, that there are a large number of divergent studies in literature, and it’s not clear why they are divergent,” Prof. Farrell told me. They attempted to reconcile disputing studies by comparing them side by side, tracing the numbers back to their original sources and converting everything to standard units. Their conclusion, published in Science in January, was largely in line with Dr. Wang’s. (So was an analysis of published studies that appeared in March in Environmental Science & Technology, and funded in part by the environmental organization Natural Resources Defense Council.)...

 

 

17. “Robert Reich and Steve Moore discuss Tom DeLay and the power structure in Washington” (Kudlow & Company, CNBC News, June 9, 2006); features commentary by ROBERT REICH.

 

LARRY KUDLOW, host: …[L]et’s listen to some parting words from Tom DeLay.

 

Representative TOM DeLAY (R-Texas): In any place or any time, on any issue, what does liberalism ever seek, Mr. Speaker? More. More government, more taxation, more control over people’s lives and decisions and wallets. If conservatives don’t stand up to liberalism, no one will. And for a long time around here, almost no one did.

 

KUDLOW: All right. Here to debate, our dynamic duo: Robert Reich, former labor secretary, professor of public policy, University of California-Berkeley; and Steve Moore of The Wall Street Journal editorial board…. I don’t know, Robert Reich. I heard that clip from Tom DeLay’s parting farewell parting speech on the floor of the House. Sounded pretty good with me. Do you have a problem with it?

 

Mr. ROBERT REICH (Former Labor Secretary): Defiant to the end. “The Hammer” does not stop hammering. Look, Larry… if we’re talking about big government that’s intrusive and large and out of control and spending that’s out of control, you … don’t have to look farther than the Bush administration. I mean, this is spending like mad, a huge budget deficit, an intrusive government spying on Americans. What in the world is Tom DeLay talking about? He was there, helping to preside over all of this.

 

Mr. STEVE MOORE (The Wall Street Journal): Well, I think [DeLay] had it exactly right. Liberalism is all about more, more taxes, more government, more regulation…. I think he got caught up in the power structure of Washington, and it gets to the whole point that, you know, power corrupts and absolutely--power corrupts absolutely….

 

Mr. REICH: Wait a--Steve, wait a minute. Let me just ask you a question. You say that he is this kind of tragic figure that got caught up in the power structure of Washington? He altered the power structure of Washington. I mean, he created an extortion racket in which the only way you as a company or an individual or a trade association could get access was by paying off the Republican Party…. He made K Street into a kind of a subsidiary, wholly owned by the Republican Party. You know that.

 

Mr. MOORE: …[DeLay] said, ‘Look, we control things. Now you business community lobbyists are going to have to start hiring Republicans.’ What’s wrong with that? That’s the way the game is played.

 

Mr. REICH: No majority leader--yeah, Steve, no majority leader had-- ever gone to trade associations, to K Street, to corporations and say, ‘You have got to have my people if we’re going to talk with you at all.’… No majority leader also had ever said to the other party, ‘You are completely closed out, we’re not going to listen to you, we’re not going to include you. We’re going to schedule votes in such a way that you are not even going to know what’s being voted on.’

 

Mr. MOORE: Bob, that’s the way the game is played in Washington.

 

Mr. REICH: Now come on. This is--this is completely trampling on the institutional foundations of our democracy….

 

 

18. “25 x 25 Energy Plan” (Science Friday, National Public Radio, June 9, 2006); program featuring DAN KAMMEN; podcast at: http://www.sciencefriday.com/pages/2006/Jun/hour2_060906.html

 

A new group of strange bedfellows, including farmers, foresters, environmentalists, and politicians, wants 25 percent of America’s energy to come from renewable resources by the year 2025. That means more ethanol, wind, and solar energy. Can it -- and should it -- be done? Some critics say beefing up ethanol production would be bad for the environment, wasting energy and potentially increasing emissions. This hour, we’ll take a look at the “25 X 25” plan and talk about America’s changing energy picture.

 

Guests:

Daniel M. Kammen

Class of 1935 Distinguished Chair in Energy

Energy and Resources Group & Goldman School of Public Policy

Director, Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory

Co-Director, Berkeley Institute of the Environment

University of California

Berkeley, California...

 

 

19. “Estate tax repeal? Bad for the economy” Commentary by ROBERT REICH (Marketplace Morning Report, National Public Radio, June 7, 2006); listen to the commentary at: http://marketplace.publicradio.org/shows/2006/06/07/AM200606071.html

 

SCOTT JAGOW, anchor: This week the Senate’s looking at repealing the estate tax; the House has already voted to get rid of it. In this edition of THE PUBLIC’S BUSINESS, commentator Robert Reich says it’s a bad move for the economy.

 

Mr. ROBERT REICH: The earnings of nearly everyone used to rise with rising productivity. That’s no longer true. Today’s workers are 24 percent more productive than they were five years ago, but their median real earnings have barely budged. What’s happened to all this extra value?

 

A big chunk has gone to people earning over $1 million a year; mostly CEOs, investment bankers and hedge fund managers….

 

Now what does this mean for the nation? Thirty years ago, the richest 1 percent owned less than a fifth of America’s total wealth. Now, according to a recent report by the Federal Reserve Board, they own over a third….

 

Super-rich couples can now pass on $4 million to their heirs tax-free. Anything over 4 million is taxed at a 45 percent rate. So why exactly is it so important to repeal the estate tax altogether? Repeal will cost the treasury nearly a trillion dollars in its first 10 years, more than the entire shortfall in Social Security. That means more federal debts or higher taxes on the middle class….

 

People who inherit great wealth just because they’re lucky enough to have super-rich parents don’t have any particular incentive to be entrepreneurial. They don’t have any particular incentive to do anything. That’s who we want to run the American economy?….

 

JAGOW: Robert Reich teaches public policy at the University of California Berkeley. He was labor secretary under President Clinton.

 

 

20. “Republicans face veteran Democrats in statewide races this fall” (San Francisco Chronicle, June 7, 2006); story citing HENRY BRADY; http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/n/a/2006/06/07/politics/p151109D05.DTL&type=printable

 

By Samantha Young, Associated Press Writer

 

Los Angeles (AP) -- Republicans hold just two of the eight statewide offices but are hoping to change their fortunes in November with what they believe is a strong roster of conservative candidates....

 

The November roster includes several well-known Democrats: state Insurance Commissioner James Garamendi seeking the lieutenant governor’s job; Oakland Mayor and former governor Jerry Brown running for attorney general; Attorney General Bill Lockyer running for state treasurer; and Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante campaigning for insurance commissioner.

 

Perhaps the most anticipated matchup is the one between Brown, 68, and Republican state Sen. Charles Poochigian, R-Fresno.

 

“The attorney general’s race is going to be an all-out slugfest,” said Henry Brady, a professor of political science and public policy at the University of California, Berkeley....

 

 

21. “It is now safe to answer the phone again” (Oakland Tribune, June 6, 2006); story citing HENRY BRADY; http://www.insidebayarea.com/portlet/article/html/fragments/print_article.jsp?article=3904359

 

By Brenda Payton [Columnist]

 

Maybe now it’s safe to answer the phone....

 

This isn’t the first campaign to use the prerecorded campaign phone calls, aka robo calls. But the practice is clearly spreading, almost as extensively as a computer virus. As if vapid mailers clogging the mailbox weren’t bad enough....

 

If everyone hates them, then why are they so popular with candidates? I asked Henry Brady, UC Berkeley professor of political science and public policy, if there are any studies of their efficacy.

 

We do know that telephone get-out-the vote campaigns aren’t particularly successful, he said. In experiments in which half the voters received the calls and half didn’t, there was no difference in the number who voted.

 

There was no impact, Brady said.

 

In that experiment, researchers could track who actually voted. It’s more difficult to track whether a person who received a call for a candidate voted for the candidate....

 

My sense is an impersonal telephone message is not tremendously successful, Brady said. So why do it? Brady pointed out telephone get-out-the-vote campaigns continue even though they have been proven ineffective. For an unknown candidate, the calls might be another way of getting his or her name out there.

 

And if they’re pretty cheap, a candidate might say, Why not?’”

 

Brady said voters are persuaded more by an endorsement by someone they know.

 

If my best friend called up, I would take my best friend’s advice seriously, Brady said. Campaigns have a hard time knowing who my best friend is....

 

 

22. “Roundtable: Robert Reich, George Will, Jay Carney” (This Week with George Stephanopoulos, ABC News, June 4, 2006); features commentary by ROBERT REICH.

 

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS (ABC NEWS moderator): (Off-camera) And we are back now with the roundtable….Welcome back to Bob Reich, professor at Berkeley, also founding chairman of “The American Prospect” magazine…. And we just saw a lot of Al Gore there promoting “An Inconvenient Truth” and walking a very fine line. No plans to run, can’t imagine running, but not gonna make any Shermanesque statements. And, George, I was watching you. You don’t believe him?

 

GEORGE WILL (ABC NEWS): (Off-camera) Well, he says the following. The planet, the whole thing is in mortal peril. That death may come in ten years. The presidency is uniquely able to deal with it. And he, Al Gore, has unique insight into this crisis. How do you say all that and then say, I don’t think I’ll run?…

 

ROBERT REICH (FORMER SECRETARY OF LABOR): I agree with George. You know, once you run for President and come that close, you won the popular vote, it’s very, very difficult to disabuse yourself of the notion that you might not do it again. Also, I can’t help but believe that the timing of the movie, 19 months before the first Democratic nomination, is not accidental. That movie could have come out last year, the year before, the year before that. I believe that he really doesn’t want to run unless he has a very good chance of winning. But when I hear some politicians say three times in a short interview ‘I’m not going to make a Shermanesque statement,” I believe that they are going to in fact run….

 

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS (ABC NEWS): (Off-camera) …Much more serious subject, Haditha. This week the investigation continued [of the alleged massacre of Iraqi civilians by Marines]. …[W]e’re already seeing, Bob Reich, the Iraqis, the new Prime Minister al-Maliki lashing out, saying that these kind of occurrences have become habitual on the part of Americans. And it might even lead him to reconsider the presence of US troops. Yet it comes at a time when he’s more dependent than ever on those troops to keep control.

 

ROBERT REICH (FORMER SECRETARY OF LABOR): Of course, George. And we’re gonna hear more and more statements from him and from the Iraqi government to the extent that there is a government, that ‘we don’t tolerate this, we don’t like this.’ But they are not going to threaten to expel the Americans. But just going back to something George just said, these Marines are on their third tour of duty, they’re under extraordinary stress. We don’t know how many Hadithas there are, frankly. It’s just an accident this came to light. If there hadn’t been any home video.…

 

…[M]any [reports of such atrocities] come to nothing. But I think there is a loss for the hearts and minds not only of the Iraqis but also the Americans. We have two audiences here, remember. Only 40% of Americans support this war now. The parallels with My Lai, I think, are important in this one respect. Yes, atrocities are going to happen in every war but in My Lai in 1968, there was a turning point in terms of public opinion. And public opinion in this country and in Iraq are turning so far against….

 

GRAPHICS: NEW TREASURY SECRETARY

 

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS (ABC NEWS): (Off-camera) So a signal there that President Bush wants him to sell the economy a little bit better. But that can’t have been a good enough reason for the chairman of Goldman Sachs to become treasury secretary, Bob Reich. It’s no secret that he was reluctant to take it. Two questions, why do you think he did? And how much difference can he make?

 

ROBERT REICH (FORMER SECRETARY OF LABOR): I think he did because he thinks that he can manage an orderly decline of the dollar. I think that’s all he can do. He’s not going to affect tax policy. He’s got going to affect spending policy. But maybe because of his good relations with China and his knowledge of international finance, that dollar is going to drop. If it drops slowly we can survive. If it drops fast we’re in trouble. And he can manage that orderly decline.

 

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS (ABC NEWS): (Off-camera) So he’s there as kind of an insurance policy for the White House against a crisis?

 

ROBERT REICH (FORMER SECRETARY OF LABOR): I think so, exactly….

 

 

23. “Two Viewpoints on Prop 82: Universal Preschool” (The California Report Magazine, KQED-88.5 FM, June 2, 2006); features commentary by DAVID KIRP; listen to the commentary at: http://www.californiareport.org/domains/californiareport/

 

There are only two statewide propositions on Tuesday’s ballot. The one that has received almost all of the attention is Proposition 82. It would raise income taxes on people making $400,000 dollars a year or more and use the money to fund pre-school for all 4-year-old children in California before they enter kindergarten. The money would be used to hire and train teachers and pay for classrooms and programs. Guests:  David Kirp, UC Berkeley professor of public policy….

 

 

24. “Op-Ed: On Proposition 82’s call for universal preschool. Should the state educate 4-year-olds? PRO: Preschool is a smart investment” (San Francisco Chronicle, June 1, 2006); op-ed by DAVID KIRP; http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/06/01/EDGDOIJM8F1.DTL&type=printable

 

By David L. Kirp, Deborah Stipek

 

David L. Kirp is a professor of public policy at UC Berkeley, and the author of a forthcoming book, “Before School,” on the preschool movement; Deborah Stipek is the dean of the Stanford School of Education. 

 

Should free, high-quality preschool be available to every 4-year-old in the state? That’s what Proposition 82, which appears on the June 6 ballot, guarantees. If the research matters, the answer is a no-brainer: pre-kindergarten is a smart investment to make in our children’s futures. A library-shelf’s worth of studies confirm what every parent already knows—that the early years of a child’s life make an enormous difference. That’s why the waiting lists for decent preschools are endless, and it’s why so many parents pinch pennies to spend, on average, $7,500 a year—more than the tuition at Cal State University campuses—to enroll their children.

 

In recent years, neuroscientists have been able to show how rapidly the brain grows. Researchers, who focus on the impact of preschool, report that providing children with a word-rich, idea-filled and emotionally supportive world, and teaching them social skills—the ability to work and play with others—helps them succeed in school and stay out of trouble down the road. As Nobel Prize-winner James Heckman puts it, skill begets skill....

 

The benefits of preschool are greatest for poor children—that’s no surprise, because those youngsters typically grow up in more stressful circumstances—but the studies show that middle-class children are also gainers. While it’s not true that, to paraphrase a familiar line, everything you really need to know you learn in preschool, it’s an important start....

 

The opponents’ biggest beef is that the measure is a giveaway to parents who can afford to send their offspring to preschool. The complaint ignores the gigantic waiting lists in many communities, the low quality of a large proportion of the preschool programs that California’s children attend, the sacrifices many middle-income families make to send their children to preschool and the economic segregation that targeted programs create. No one regards kindergarten as a “giveaway,” even though it’s available to all. It’s a taken-for-granted part of the common school system, something that’s meant for everyone, rather than a means-tested benefit such as food stamps or a welfare check....

 

 

25. “High likelihood of US military action against Iran says expert” (The World Today, Australian Broadcasting Corporation, April 12, 2006); TV program features interview with MICHAEL NACHT.

 

(REPORTER) ELEANOR HALL: A security consultant to the United States Defence Department and a former adviser to President Clinton on nuclear arms reduction says today’s announcement by Iran [that their scientists have successfully enriched a small amount of uranium] is deeply worrying.

 

Dr Michael Nacht, who is now Dean of Public Policy at University of California, predicts that there is a high likelihood that there will be a military confrontation between Iran and the United States before the end of President George W. Bush’s term.

 

But speaking to me earlier today, Dr Nacht said the choices for the international community are limited and that doing nothing in response to Iran’s latest challenge is not an option.

 

MICHAEL NACHT: There of course are different judgements about how quickly they can actually fabricate and then deploy a nuclear weapon…. But there’s no doubt that they have the capability and they’re moving in the right direction from their perspective.

 

ELEANOR HALL: Well President Ahmadinejad actually scoffed that the United Nations Security Council knows it can’t do anything. How should the international community respond then? I mean are sanctions a realistic option?

 

MICHAEL NACHT: I actually don’t think they’re very realistic, because in economic terms, the European Union and many other countries trade extensively with Iran, they’re very dependent on Iranian oil. There are just too many economic interests that Iranians have as leverage that would produce a set of sanctions of the kind that the Americans want. And... with respect to a UN approved sanction that the Security Council has to approve, I would be very surprised if either Russia or China supported any effort at sanctioning Iran.

 

ELEANOR HALL: So what message does that send?

 

MICHAEL NACHT: The message is that the path they’re on is going to pay off…. They can basically develop a nuclear energy program. They can, in addition, in my view, work on a clandestine nuclear weapons program, and they can also maintain bilateral and multilateral economic and political relations with many countries in the world. And in doing all that, they strengthen the hand of the regime internally and they reduce… their own internal opposition….

 

ELEANOR HALL: So if you were advising the Bush administration at the moment, what would you be suggesting they do in response to this statement?

 

MICHAEL NACHT: I probably would try a multiple strategy. I would not give up on the multilateral diplomatic IAEA UN sanctions strategy, which is largely what they are doing. I would pursue that. I’m not very optimistic it would work, but I would pursue that.

 

I probably at some point would engage in direct diplomatic negotiations with the Iranians. I’d at least try. I don’t think you have a lot to lose. I think that’s been a mistake of the Bush administration - not to negotiate directly with the Iranians or frankly with the North Koreans.

 

And then I would have a military option, but you’d have to really make the case to the American people and to the international community about the justification for this. And frankly right now, of course, President Bush is in a very weakened position….

 

ELEANOR HALL: But you’re saying that even with the threat that military action could unleash more terrorism, that is a better option than allowing Iran to continue.

 

MICHAEL NACHT: Yes. It could have very... there’s no doubt that it could have very adverse consequences if we act militarily. I think you’d have to go in with your eyes wide open.

 

But the precedent of Iran going down this path, the precedent for others, the impact further even on North Korea, the impact on a possible - which has been discussed - a possible Saudi-Pakistani-Sunni nuclear program and nuclear alliance to combat the Iranian Shia nuclear program.

 

This is all very bad news and I do think, though perhaps I’m misreading the situation, I do think that Bush will act one way or the other. It will be resolved in some... let’s say it’ll be transformed by the end of his tenure….

 

FACULTY SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS & EVENTS

Back to top

June 14-16    ROBERT REICH was keynote speaker at IDC’s IT Forum & Expo in Boston; http://www.idcitexpo.com/ .

 

June 15        JOHN ELLWOOD gave the plenary address at the APPAM spring conference: “A Morphology of Graduate Education for Public Service in the United States,” after welcome remarks by DAVID WEIMER (MPP 1975, PhD 1978), APPAM President.

 

June 15        MICHAEL O’HARE presented his paper, “Pedagogy for Policy Analysis and Management,” at the APPAM spring conference, Salt Lake City, UT.

 

June 16        EUGENE BARDACH was discussion leader in the session, “How to Move Students Toward Mastery,” at the APPAM spring conference, in which the rapporteur was JOHN MENDELOFF (MPP 1974, PhD 1977).

 

June 16        MICHAEL NACHT was rapporteur of the session, “Managing the Policy School Enterprise,” in which SANDRA ARCHIBALD (MPP 1971) presented her paper, at the APPAM spring conference.

 

June 29        DANIEL KAMMEN spoke at a forum on: “Plug-In Hybrid Vehicles: A California Vision For Kicking America’s Oil Addiction And Reducing Transportation’s Impact On Global Climate” at the Commonwealth Club, San Francisco. http://www.commonwealthclub.org/mlf/

 

VIDEOS & WEBCASTS

Back to top

1. “The Class of 2006 Commencement, May 20, 2006” can be viewed at: /news-events/archive.html

The ceremony featured Dean Michael Nacht's welcome to family and friends; Larry Rosenthal (MPP 1993, PhD 2000), president of the Alumni Board; student speakers Stephen Wald and Juanita Brown; retiring Faculty member Eugene BardachGreg Kato presented the class gift.  Prof. Steven Raphael presented the Outstanding Student Instructor Award to Sonya Blesser; Prof. Jane Mauldon presented the Smolensky Prize for Outstanding Advanced Policy Analysis to S. Derek Turner whose APA (on Universal Service Reform -- to provide universal, affordable high-speed broadband service to the entire public) has already been read into the Congressional Record.  Former Labor Secretary and now permanent member of faculty, Prof. Robert Reich, gave the keynote commencement address.

Also viewable on UC Webcast: http://webcast.berkeley.edu/events/archive.php?select2=36

 

 

2. “Building Bridges: Keeping Youth Connected.” Webcast at: /buildingbridges/

 

On March 15, 2006 the Goldman School of Public Policy and the City and County of San Francisco co-hosted this event to discuss service integration and inter-agency collaboration as effective strategies for improving an array of services for transitional youth that is currently fragmented. Mayor Gavin Newsom swore in a Task Force for Transitional Youth.

 

A U.C. Berkeley student committee, spear-headed by BETSY BAUM (MPP 2006), organized the event in conjunction with NANI COLORETTI (MPP 1994) of the San Francisco Mayor’s Office and Rachel Antrobus of the Youth Commission. DEAN MICHAEL NACHT made opening remarks, acknowledging the contributions of staff member KATE ANDERSON and HEIDI SOMMER (PhD cand.). MICHELE BYRNES (MPP 2003), director of Honoring Emancipated Youth, was acknowledged by an emancipated youth speaker. Panelist AMY LEMLEY (MPP 1998) was introduced as co-founder of First Place Fund for Youth, “acknowledged nationally as one of most creative organizations serving emancipated foster youth,” and currently with the John Burton Foundation for Children Without Homes. Prof. JANE MAULDON moderated the Q&A.

 

 

3. “What Would Franklin Do?  A Centrist Civic Primer on Religion, Politics and Community-Serving Programs” – The 2006 Aaron Wildavsky Forum debuts nationally on UCTV this month.  Locally it can be seen on cable (Comcast) in Berkeley on ch. 33 on Wednesday, July 19, 2006 at 5:00 pm. To view the full schedule for this program, or to view on demand go to: http://www.uctv.tv/search-details.asp?showID=11652

 

An archive of GSPP programs on UCTV is accessible at: http://www.uctv.tv/series/index.asp?show=show&number=57

 

 

If you would like further information about any of the above, or hard copies of cited articles, we’d be happy to provide them.

 

We are always delighted to receive your material for inclusion in the Digest.  Please email the editor at wong23@berkeley.edu .

 

Sincerely,

Annette Doornbos

Director of External Relations and Development

 

Visit the Goldman School’s website at: /

 

(This digest was edited by Theresa Wong)